You Know Im Something of a Homosexual Myself

'I am gay – but I wasn't born this way'

(Image credit:

Getty Images

)

Is sexuality purely the result of our biology? Brandon Ambrosino argues that simplistic explanations have ignored the fluid, shape-shifting nature of our desires.

"Yous can't be gay."

She was on summit of me.

It wasn't a command — information technology was a claiming. You and then manifestly cannot be gay, was her implication, considering this is good sex.

It was 2006, a full five years before Lady Gaga would set the Built-in This Way argument atop its unassailable cultural perch, just even and then the popular understanding of orientation was that it was something yous were born with, something you couldn't change. If you happened to engage in activity that ran counter to your sexual identity, and so you had two options: you were lying to yourself and everyone else, or you lot were just experimenting.

The sexual categories were rigid. Fixed. They weren't subject to human imagination or experimentation – to the frustration of many sociologists, and kids, like myself, who constitute themselves inexplicably in bed with a role player from the other team.

My sexual journey through college was annihilation but run-of-the-manufactory. I came out at a conservative Christian college in the US and was in a gay relationship for around two years with a basketball role player who ended up marrying a woman. During that time, we both pal'd effectually with girls on the side. I fifty-fifty went so far every bit to fall in dear with ane. To this twenty-four hours, she and I joke virtually how she was the only daughter I was ever in love with, and how I would've been quite happy marrying her.

As a author, this kind of complicated story is incredibly interesting to me – mostly considering it shows that my own personal history resists the kind of easy classifications that have come to dominate discussions of sexuality. Well, y'all must accept been gay the whole time, some might call back, and because of some religious shame, you decided to lie to yourself and experiment with a daughter. But that was nothing more than than a blip in the road. After all, most kids experiment with heterosexuality in college, don't they?

If then, that 'bleep in the road' has always been a thorn in my flesh. How do I explicate that I was honestly in dearest with a woman? Some people might argue that I am innately bisexual, with the chapters to love both women and men. But that doesn't experience similar an authentic clarification of my sexual history, either.

I'm only speaking for myself here. But what feels most accurate to say is that I'thou gay – just I wasn't born this fashion.

Many people may observe their desires changing management - and information technology can't but be explained as experimentation (Credit: Ignacio Lehmann)

In 1977, just over 10% of Americans thought gayness was something you were born with, co-ordinate to Gallup. That number has steadily risen over time and is currently somewhere betwixt 42% and l%, depending on the poll. Throughout the same menstruum, the number of Americans who believe homosexuality is "due to someone's upbringing/environment" barbarous from just under 60% to 37%.

These ideas reached critical mass in popular culture, beginning with Lady Gaga's 2011 Born This Way and 1 year later on with Macklemore's Aforementioned Dearest, the chorus of which has a gay person singing "I can't modify fifty-fifty if I tried, even if I wanted to." Videos started circulating on the internet featuring gay people asking straight people "when they chose to exist straight." Effectually the same time, the Human Rights Campaign declared unequivocally that "Existence gay is not a choice," and to merits that information technology is "gives unwarranted credence to roundly disproven practices such as conversion or reparative therapy."

As Jane Ward notes in Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men, what'due south interesting about many of these claims is how transparent their speakers are with their political motivations. "Such statements," she writes, "infuse biological accounts with an obligatory and nearly coercive force, suggesting that anyone who describes homosexual want equally a pick or social construction is playing into the easily of the enemy." People who claiming the Born This Style narrative are often cast as homophobic, and their thinking is considered backward – even if they are themselves gay.

Take, for example, Cynthia Nixon of Sex and The City fame. In a 2012 interview with New York Times Mag, the extra casually mentioned that homosexuality was, for her, a choice. "I empathise that for many people it's not, but for me it'south a choice, and you don't go to define my gayness for me."

The blogger John Aravosis was one of many critics who pounced on Nixon. "Every religious correct hatemonger is at present going to quote this woman every single time they want to deny u.s.a. our civil rights." Aravosis leveled the same accusations against me in 2014 when I wrote a piece for The New Democracy discussing my ain complicated sexual history. Calling me "idiotic" and "obviously absurd", Aravosis wrote, "The gay haters at the religious right couldn't have written it any better."

Gay rights practise not have to hinge on a genetic caption for sexuality (Credit: Ignacio Lehmann)

For Aravosis, and many gay activists similar him, the public volition only accept and affirm gay people if they call back they were born gay. And yet the available research does not support this view. Patrick Grzanka, Banana Professor of Psychology at University of Tennessee, for instance, has shown that some people who believe that homosexuality is innate still hold negative views of gays. In fact, the homophobic and non-homophobic respondents he studied shared similar levels of belief in a Born This Way ideology.

As Samantha Allen notes at The Daily Brute, the growing public back up for gays and lesbians has grown out of proportion with the ascension in the number of people who believe homosexuality is fixed at nascence; it would be unlikely that this pocket-sized change in opinion could explain the spike in back up for gay union, for example. Instead, she suggests it hinges on the fact that far more people are now personally acquainted with someone who is gay. In 1985, simply 24% of American respondents said they had a gay friend, relative or co-worker — in 2013, that number was at 75%. "Information technology doesn't seem to matter as much whether or non people believe that gay people are born that way as it does that they simply know someone who is currently gay," Allen concludes.

In spite of these studies, those who push against Born This Style narratives have been heavily criticised past gay activists. "They tell me my own homo-negativity is being manifested in my work," says Grzanka. Similarly, Ward has received her ain hatemail for pushing confronting the ruling LGB narratives, with some gays telling her she's "worse than Ann Coulter," the controversial United states of america writer of books like If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans. And when I published my essay on choosing to be gay, an irate American lesbian activist wrote me that it had "just been confirmed" to her that my writing was "directly responsible for iv gay deaths in Russia."

While I can empathise why some contemporary activists (and the journalists who seem beholden to their agendas) might chalk up contempo gains in LGB acceptance to Built-in This Way's cultural infiltration, activism must exist founded upon facts and truths, or the whole program volition somewhen plough out to exist a sham. Drowning out every vocalisation that dares to question dominant cultural narratives is non the aforementioned thing as invalidating the arguments those voices are making.

Every bit Ward says, "Just because an argument is politically expedient doesn't make information technology true."

It is only in recent history that we have started to characterization sexual orientations with rigid categories (Credit: Ignacio Lehmann)

So what does the science say about Built-in This Way?

Let'due south kickoff be clear that whatever the origins of our sexual orientation, there is a unanimous opinion that gay "conversion therapy" should be rejected. These efforts are potentially harmful, according to the APA, "because they present the view that the sexual orientation of lesbian, gay and bisexual youth is a mental illness of disorder, and they often frame the disability to change 1's sexual orientation every bit a personal and moral failure." Fiddling wonder these therapies have been shown to provoke feet, depression and fifty-fifty suicide.

In other words, the question of the efficacy of conversion therapies is a non-issue. We condemn these efforts not simply because we don't remember they work — mayhap anyone could be tortured into liking or disliking annihilation? — just because they're immoral.

The question of what leads to homosexuality in the first place, however, is obscure, fifty-fifty to the experts. The APA, for example, while noting that most people feel little to no pick over their orientations, says this of homosexuality's origins:

"Although much inquiry has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by whatsoever particular factor or factors."

Similarly, the American Psychiatric Association writes in a 2013 statement that while the causes of heterosexuality and homosexuality are currently unknown, they are likely "multifactorial including biological and behavioral roots which may vary between unlike individuals and may even vary over time."

True, various eye-grabbing headlines over the years have claimed that some scientists have plant something like The Gay Cistron. In 1991, for example, neuroscientist Simon LaVey published findings that he claimed suggest that "sexual orientation has a biological substrate." According to LeVay's research, a specific part of the brain, the 3rd interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus (INAH-3), is smaller in homosexual men than it is in heterosexual men.

Try as they might, scientists accept struggled to identity any detail genes that consistently predict the directions of our dear and desire (Credit: Ignacio Lehmann)

Read more

You tin spot the trouble with this study a mile away: were the gay brains LeVay studied born that style, or did they become that style? LeVay himself pointed this out to Discover Magazine in 1994: "Since I looked at adult brains, we don't know if the differences I found were in that location at nascence or if they appeared later." Further, the brains LeVay studied belonged to AIDS victims, and so he couldn't fifty-fifty exist sure if what he was seeing had something to do with the disease.

Another landmark paper on the origins of homosexuality was published in 1993 by a geneticist named Dean Hamer, who was interested to larn whether homosexuality could be inherited. Starting time from his observation that there are more gay relatives on a female parent's side than a father's, Hamer turned his attending to the X chromosome (which is passed on by the mother). He then recruited 40 pairs of gay brothers and got to work. What he found was that 33 of those brothers shared matching DNA in the Xq28, a region in the Ten chromosome. Hamer'due south determination? He believes at that place'due south most "99.5% certainty that there is a gene (or genes) in this area of the X chromosome that predisposes a male to become a heterosexual."

A 2015 study sought to confirm Hamer's findings, this time with a much larger sample: 409 pairs of gay brothers. Researchers were pleased with their findings, which they claimed "support the existence of genes on… Xq28 influencing development of male sexual orientation."

Just not everyone finds the results disarming, according to Scientific discipline. For one matter, the report relied on a technique called genetic linkage, which has been widely replaced past genome-wide association studies. Information technology'due south also noteworthy that Sanders himself urged his study to exist viewed with a certain caution. "We don't retrieve genetics is the whole story," he said. "It's not."

And every bit Allen points out, there have also been studies that plant no "X-linked cistron underlying male person homosexuality." Perchance predictably, these studies haven't received as much media coverage.

Besides the individual critiques leveled against each new report announcing some gay factor discovery, there are major methodological criticisms to make nigh the entire enterprise in general, equally Grzanka points out: "If nosotros await at the ravenous pursuit, particularly among American scientists, to find a gay gene, what we come across is that the conclusion has already been arrived at. All scientific discipline is doing is waiting to observe the proof."

The other problem with Built-in This Way scientific discipline is summed up nicely past Simon Copland: "Scientists are asking whether homosexuality is natural when we tin't even agree exactly what homosexuality is."

Grzanka agrees. "If you know anything about social constructionism, then yous know these sexual categories are very recent. How and then could they be rooted in our genome?" Our desires may express themselves in many different means that do non all conform to existing notions of 'gay', 'straight' or 'bisexual'.

This is 1 of the all-time takeaways of Ward'due south Not Gay, a penetrating analysis of sexual practice between straight white men. Gay men make up only a fraction of the US population — notwithstanding Ward says that there are many men not included in that number who appoint in homosexual behavior. Why, then, do some men who have sex with men identify as gay, and others identify as heterosexual? This question interests her far more 'how were they born?'.

Ward stresses that not all direct-identifying men who accept sex with men are bisexual or closeted, and we do a disservice if we forcefulness those words on them. That'south because terms like 'heterosexual' and 'straight' and 'bisexual' and 'gay' come with all sorts of cultural baggage attached. Crucially, she argues, "whether or non this luggage is appealing is a separate matter altogether from the appeal of homosexual or heterosexual sex."

Fifty-fifty if yous accept that sexual want may exist on a kind of spectrum, the predominant idea is still that these desires are innate and immutable – only this runs counter to what we know virtually human taste, says Ward. "Our desires are oriented and re-oriented based on our experiences throughout our lives."

Gay or not, our desires are oriented and re-oriented throughout our lives (Credit: Ignacio Lehmann)

In fact, the straight-identified men Ward studied for her book sometimes found themselves in situations that sparked the desire for homosexual sexual practice: fraternities, deployments, public restrooms, etc. But Ward doesn't conclude these are somehow repressed or latent gay men. Rather, she argues that they — similar all of us — accept come to want bodies and genitals within specific social contexts pregnant with "significant cultural and erotically charged meanings." In other words, what they want isn't the "raw fact" of a homo's trunk, just what information technology represents in a certain context.

Why might we be uncomfortable asking whether and how much control we each possess over our "full range of erotic possibilities," as Ward calls information technology? "What would information technology mean to remember about people'southward capacity to cultivate their ain sexual desires, in the same way nosotros might cultivate a taste for food?" she asks. Ward thinks this question is the next frontier of queer thought.

When I first said I chose to be gay, a queer American journalist challenged me to name the time and appointment of my choice. But this is an absurd way to look at want. You might besides enquire someone to name the exact moment they began liking Chaucer or disliking Hemingway. When did I begin to adopt lilies to roses? What time did the clock read at the exact moment I roughshod in love with my partner? All of our desires are continually being shaped throughout our lives, in the very specific contexts in which we discover and rehearse them.

Thinking dorsum to my college romances with women and men, I tin can begin to understand how my own experiences might have helped me to 'cultivate' my desire for homosexuality. I want to be very clear: I'chiliad not claiming I simply began to 'abound into' my homosexuality, or that equally I became more than comfortable with beingness gay, I immune myself the liberty to express what had always been latent within me. I'm claiming that at some bespeak during college, my sexual and romantic desires became reoriented toward men. These desires suggested to me a queer identity, which I at first reluctantly accepted so passionately embraced. This new identity in plow helped reinforce and grow new gay desires within me.

Granted, none of this means that there were no genetic or prenatal factors that went into the construction of my or any other sexual orientation. It just ways that fifty-fifty if those factors exist, many more factors do too. So why non encourage conversations about those other things?

Humans aren't who and what we are considering of ane gene. We're who and what we are for a variety of reasons, and some of it might have something to do with how our genes randomly collaborate with our environments. Just that's non the whole story, and to engage in discourse that pretends it is — regardless of the nobility of the intentions — could accept "profound and very negative consequences" for the LGBT community, says Grzanka.

"Limiting our understanding of whatever circuitous human experience is always going to be worse than assuasive it to be complicated," he says.

Early gay rights activists compared sexuality to religion - a crucial part of our life that we should be free to practise however nosotros like (Credit: Ignacio Lehamann)

And so what are we to do with the Born This Way rhetoric? I would advise that it's fourth dimension to build a more nuanced statement — regardless of how adept a popular song the current one makes.

At that place are several reasons for this. Firstly, and most importantly, it's just not the truth, every bit nosotros currently understand it. The testify to date offers no consensus that the Born This Way argument is the first and finish of the story. We should stop pretending that it does.

Secondly, the unabridged search for a gay gene is predicated upon the assumption that homosexuality is not the natural or 'default' state of a developing human. 'Something had to happen to make that homo gay!'

Just why sacrifice such enormous footing to those who believe something has 'gone wrong' inside gay bodies and brains? For that matter, why play their game and pretend the only forms of difference that deserve justice are those we were born with? "That'due south a very narrow understanding of what justice looks like," says Ward.

What nigh the concern that homophobes will desire to 'encourage' gay people to be straight if there's no biological ground for sexuality? Permit's turn it around. Is information technology not equally true that 'finding a gay gene' might inspire the same homophobes to 'find a cure' for homosexuals? It doesn't take besides much creativity to imagine a scenario in which homophobic parents, upon being informed their fetus has 'the gay cistron', choose what to them may seem the lesser of 2 evils: ballgame.

Finally, I would argue that the Born This Fashion narrative can actively damage our perceptions of ourselves. In my sophomore twelvemonth of college, I attended a Gay Student Alliance event at a nearby campus. It was the concluding meeting before Thanksgiving pause, and the theme was coming out to your families. The idea was that the students would rehearse the coming out oral communication that they'd deliver while they were home. Educatee after student, while sobbing hysterically, said something similar this: "Mom, you see how much hurting this is causing me! Of course, I'd want to be straight if information technology were up to me. This is but who I am! You accept to take that considering I can't change that."

I wanted to catch each of them and say, "Existence gay is not a handicap. It's OK to be queer even if you choose to be queer — and y'all should desire to be queer! Because we are beautiful and fabled."

Ward sees this every bit a self-hating narrative. "Could you imagine if the dominant narrative of people of colour was, 'Well, of class I'd want to be white if I could. Wouldn't everyone want to be white?' That's then racist! We'd never accept that story."

According to surveys, less than half of Generation Z identify every bit "100% heterosexual", suggesting more than and more people have embraced their sexual fluidity (Credit: Ignacio Lehmann)

Perhaps it is fourth dimension to look to the outset of the gay rights motion. "Queer Nation and earlier movements in the United states of america were not fundamentally organized effectually Born This Way explanations," says Grzanka. "They were organized effectually sexual liberation, and the radical notion of challenging heteronormativity."

Gay and lesbian activists, says Ward, used to depict on organized religion parallels to fence for inclusion. "People aren't born with their religions. They're born into religious cultures, and they can catechumen if they'd like. But there are still legal protections for them." Eventually activists decided that argument wasn't working fast plenty, especially in the shadow of the AIDS epidemic. "So there was a shift, and the leaders of the movement chose to jump on board with a less nuanced argument that people already understood: simply similar race, people are built-in with their homosexuality."

Fortunately, nosotros take now fabricated enormous strides in understanding and affirming our queer sexualities. Some experts have even started using categories like 'mostly straight' and 'mostly gay' to try and aggrandize our limited means of viewing human sexuality. A recent United kingdom poll from J. Walter Thompson Innovation grouping establish that only 48% of Generation Z (ages 18-24) identify as "100% heterosexual." Respondents were asked to rate themselves on a calibration from zero (which signified "completely directly") to half dozen ("completely homosexual"). More than a third chose a number between one and five.

In response to the poll, i of my Facebook friends quipped about how natural option must be working in overtime, what with making all of us gay! Indeed, as Ward notes, the Generation Z findings don't signal some evolutionary shift over the concluding 15 years. Rather, they evidence that the times — the 'nurture' part of the nature/nurture dichotomy — are irresolute. Homosexuality isn't considered taboo. Heterosexuality isn't (always) considered the compulsory norm. And chiefly, each isn't always constructed in opposition to the other.

I'1000 thankful for a new generation that is capable of imagining sexuality in a way that transcends the gay/straight binary, that couldn't care less most what happened to their bodies and minds to make them who they are today. I'm hopeful that for this generation, sexual histories like mine and Cynthia Nixon's aren't seen equally threatening, but liberating.

I don't think I was born gay. I don't think I was born straight. I was born the way all of us are born: as a human being with a seemingly infinite capacity to denote myself, to re-denote myself, to endeavour on new identities like spring raincoats, to play with limiting categories, to challenge them and topple them, to cultivate my tastes and preferences, and, almost chiefly, to dear and to receive dearest.

--

This story is function of our Sexual Revolutions series on our evolving understanding of sex activity and gender.

Brandon Ambrosino is a freelance announcer. He Tweets equally @BrandonAmbro. Ignacio Lehmann is an Argentinian photographer who has travelled the globe for his 100 Earth Kisses project.

Join 600,000+ Future fans past liking united states on Facebook , or follow us on Twitter , Google+ , LinkedIn and Instagram . If you liked this story, sign upwards for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter , called "If Yous But Read 6 Things This Week". A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Earth, Civilization, Capital, Travel and Autos, delivered to your inbox every Fri.

kramersuliterty57.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160627-i-am-gay-but-i-wasnt-born-this-way

Share this post